بررسی اثرات رفتاری محدودیت‌های بودجه‌ای ناشی از بحران‌ها: مطالعه موردی کووید 19

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه (س)، قم، ایران

2 باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، واحد آبادان ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آبادان، ایران

چکیده

بحران‌ها می‌توانند منجر به تغییراتی در رویه‌های کنترل مدیریتی مخصوصاً کنترل‌های بودجه‌ای گردند. ازاین‌رو پژوهش حاضر تلاش دارد اثرات رفتاری محدودیت‌های بودجه‌ای ناشی از بحران‌ها (مطالعه موردی کووید 19) را مورد مطالعه و بررسی قرار دهد. این پژوهش به‌لحاظ هدف کاربردی و به‌لحاظ روش گردآوری داده‎ها توصیفی‌-پیمایشی، از نوع همبستگی است. داده‌های پژوهش حاضر از طریق توزیع پرسش‎نامه بین 97 مدیر مالی و اداری جمع‌آوری شده است. دوره زمانی پژوهش حاضر زمستان سال 1400 است. تحلیل داده‌های پژوهش با استفاده از روش مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری انجام شده است. براساس یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر (1) بحران ناشی از کووید 19 باعث تشدید محدودیت‌های بودجه‌ای می‌شود. (2) محدودیت‌های بودجه‌ای از طریق اثرگذاری بر استرس‌های شغلی (تعارض نقش و ابهام نقش) باعث خستگی عاطفی مجریان بودجه می‌گردد. (3) بودجه‌های کارآمد باعث تعدیل رابطه بین محدودیت‌های بودجه‌ای با استرس‌های شغلی می‌گردد. (4) انتظارات مدیران ارشد باعث تشدید رابطه بین محدودیت‌های بودجه‌ای با استرس‌های شغلی می‌گردد. بنابر یافته‌های این پژوهش، مطالعه و بررسی تغییرات در محدودیت‌های بودجه‌ای می‌تواند باعث درک هرچه بهتر نحوه اثرگذاری رویه‌های بودجه‌ریزی بر این تغییرات و همچنین نحوه تأثیرپذیری این رویه‌ها از واکنش‌های سازمانی نسبت به یک بحران شود. درنهایت، پیشنهاد می‌شود سازمان‌ها بر کنترل‌های رفتاری همچون کنترل‌های بودجه‌ای آن‌هم با هدف اطمینان از رعایت مداوم اصول بودجه‌ای در فرایند اجرا تمرکز ویژه‌ای داشته باشند

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Behavioural Effects of Budget Tightness Caused by Crises: A Case Study of Covid-19 Pandemic

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Nazaripour 1
  • babak zakizadeh 2
1 Accounting Department, Hazrat_e Masoumeh University (HMU), Qom, Iran
2 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Crises can lead to changes in management control practices, especially budget controls. Therefore, this study attempts to investigate the behavioral effects of budget tightness of the Covid-19 crisis. The present study is practical in nature and is considered as a descriptive-exploratory correlation study. The required data were collected through the distribution of questionnaires among 97 administrative and financial managers. The time period of this study is the first season of year 2022. The research data were analyzed using structural equation modeling method. According to the research findings, (1) the crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic causes to tighten budget controls. (2) the crisis-induced budget tightening will be positively associated with emotional exhaustion through role conflict and role ambiguity (job stressors), respectively. (3) Enabling budgets moderate the relationship between budget tightness and job stressors. (4) The expectations of senior managers intensify the relationship between budget tightness and job stressors. Based on the research findings, studying the changes in the tightness of budget control can lead to a better understanding of how budgeting practices affect these changes and also how these practices are affected by organizational responses to a crisis. Finally, it is suggested that firms increase the emphasis they place on behavioral controls such as budgetary controls to ensure ongoing compliance in the implementation process.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Crisis
  • Budget Tightness
  • Role Conflict
  • Role Ambiguity
  • Emotional Exhaustion
  • Covid-19 Pandemic

Smiley face

مراجع

نمازی، محمد و غلامرضا رضایی (1399). ارائه چهارچوب جامع کنترل مازاد بودجه‌ای در دستگاه‌های دولتی با استفاده از حسابداری مدیریت راهبردی، فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی برنامه‌ریزی  و بودجه، سال بیست وپنجم، شماره 3 صص1 تا 31.
Alarcon, G. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of burnout with job demands, resources, and attitudes. Journal of vocational behavior, 79(2), 549-562.
Anderson, S. W., & Lillis, A. M. (2011). Corporate frugality: Theory, measurement and practice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1349-1387.
Bedford, D. S., & Malmi, T. (2015). Configurations of control: An exploratory analysis. Management Accounting Research, 27, 2-26.
Bedford, D. S., Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. (2022). Budgeting and employee stress in times of crisis: Evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101346.
Becker, S. D., Mahlendorf, M. D., Schäffer, U., & Thaten, M. (2016). Budgeting in times of economic crisis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1489-1517.
Bisbe, J., Kruis, A. M., & Madini, P. (2019). Coercive, enabling, diagnostic, and interactive control: Untangling the threads of their connections. Journal of Accounting Literature.
Burkert, M., Fischer, F. M., & Schäffer, U. (2011). Application of the controllability principle and managerial performance: The role of role perceptions. Management accounting research, 22(3), 143-159.
Burney, L., & Widener, S. K. (2007). Strategic performance measurement systems, job‐relevant information, and managerial behavioral responses—Role stress and performance. Behavioral research in accounting, 19(1), 43-69.
Bundy, J., Pfarrer, M. D., Short, C. E., & Coombs, W. T. (2017). Crises and crisis management: Integration, interpretation, and research development. Journal of management, 43(6), 1661-1692.
Carter, M.J., & Harper, H. (2016). Role Ambiguity. In book: The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Family Studies. DOI:10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs040
Casas-Arce, P., Indjejikian, R. J., & Matějka, M. (2020). Bonus plan choices during an economic downturn. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 32(2), 85-105.
Chapman, C. S., & Kihn, L. A. (2009). Information system integration, enabling control and performance. Accounting, organizations and society, 34(2), 151-169.
Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of applied psychology, 95(5), 834.
Creary, S. J., & Gordon, J. R. (2016). Role conflict, role overload, and role strain. Encyclopedia of family studies, 1-6.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.
Curristine, T., Doherty, L., Imbert, B., Rahim, F. S., Tang, V., & Wendling, C. (2020). Budgeting in a crisis: guidance for preparing the 2021 budget. IMF Special Series on COVID-19, 1, 1-10.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1988). Dynamics of organizational control: the case of Berol Kemi AB. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(4), 415-430.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization science, 12(4), 450-467.
Dong, X. T., & Chung, Y. W. (2021). The mediating effect of perceived stress and moderating effect of trust for the relationship between employee silence and behavioral outcomes. Psychological Reports, 124(4), 1715-1737.
Hofmann, C., & Van Lent, L. (2017). Organizational design and control choices. The Oxford handbook of strategy implementation, 451-480.
Hopwood, A. G. (2009). The economic crisis and accounting: Implications for the research community. Accounting, organizations and society, 34(6-7), 797-802.
Janke, R., Mahlendorf, M. D., & Weber, J. (2014). An exploratory study of the reciprocal relationship between interactive use of management control systems and perception of negative external crisis effects. Management Accounting Research, 25(4), 251-270.
Johansson, T., & Siverbo, S. (2014). The appropriateness of tight budget control in public sector organizations facing budget turbulence. Management Accounting Research, 25(4), 271-283.
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of management review, 23(3), 531-546.
Kilroy, S., Flood, P. C., Bosak, J., & Chênevert, D. (2016). Perceptions of high‐involvement work practices and burnout: the mediating role of job demands. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(4), 408-424.
Kuipers, S., & Wolbers, J. (2021). Organizational and institutional crisis management. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Klusmann, U., Aldrup, K., Schmidt, J., & Lüdtke, O. (2021). Is emotional exhaustion only the result of work experiences? A diary study on daily hassles and uplifts in different life domains. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 34(2), 173-190.
Li, A. N., & Tan, H. H. (2013). What happens when you trust your supervisor? Mediators of individual performance in trust relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(3), 407-425.
Marginson, D. (2006). Information processing and management control: a note exploring the role played by information media in reducing role ambiguity. Management accounting research, 17(2), 187-197.
Marginson, D., & Bui, B. (2009). Examining the human cost of multiple role expectations. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 21(1), 59-81.
Marginson, D., McAulay, L., Roush, M., & van Zijl, T. (2014). Examining a positive psychological role for performance measures. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 63-75.
Marginson, D., & Ogden, S. (2005). Coping with ambiguity through the budget: the positive effects of budgetary targets on managers' budgeting behaviors. Accounting, organizations and society, 30(5), 435-456.
Maas, V. S., & Matejka, M. (2009). Balancing the dual responsibilities of business unit controllers: Field and survey evidence. The Accounting Review, 84(4), 1233-1253.
Merchant, K. A. (1990). The effects of financial controls on data manipulation and management myopia. Accounting, organizations and society, 15(4), 297-313.
Milburn, T. W., Schuler, R. S., & Watman, K. H. (1983). Organizational crisis. Part I: Definition and conceptualization. Human relations, 36(12), 1141-1160.
Mucci, D. M., Frezatti, F., & Bido, D. D. S. (2021). Enabling design characteristics and budget usefulness. RAUSP Management Journal, 56, 38-54.
Parker, R. J., & Kyj, L. (2006). Vertical information sharing in the budgeting process. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(1), 27-45.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review, 23(3), 393-404.
Schelenz, R. (2020). Sept. 3. Job burnout is a billion-dollar problem. Can we fix it, despite Covid-19.
Seppala, E., & Cameron, K. (2015). Proof that positive work cultures are more productive. Harvard Business Review, 12(1), 44-50.
Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of management review, 17(1), 9-38.
Skinner, D., Dietz, G., & Weibel, A. (2014). The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a ‘poisoned chalice’. Organization, 21(2), 206-224.
United Nations. (2021). Department of Economic and Social Affairs Economic Analysis, World economic situation and prospects: February 2021 Briefing, no. 146.
Van der Stede, W. A. (2011). Management accounting research in the wake of the crisis: some reflections. European Accounting Review, 20(4), 605-623.
Wouters, M., & Wilderom, C. (2008). Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 488-516.
پژوهش‌های راهبردی بودجه و مالیه
دوره 3، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 12
فصلنامه زمستان
دی 1401
صفحه 153-183

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 آبان 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 15 آذر 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 03 دی 1401

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار